3.2 Manual Iterative Searches for best fit

In the more complex situation of modeling a nerve cell, involving morphology as well as channel types and densities, it is very difficult to apply conventional algorithms and one must try to find the best assignment of parameters such as morphological values, and channel characteristics (types and densities) by trial and error. The presence of multiple minima in parameter space requires a very extensive search for the best overall or "global minumum" to give confidence in the assignments. In such cases, a very useful and helpful approach is to employ multiple data sets or types, all of which must be reasonably fit simultaneously (by a single parameter set). For example, when I was trying to find the best assignment of Hodgkin-Huxley channels in a presynaptic terminal, I attempted to find a simultaneous match to five records of presynaptic current observed at five different locations along the length of a neuromuscular junction with a "loose patch" electrode. Presynaptic sodium current flowed inward at the heminode (just beyond the end of the myelin) and the return circuit was via potassium current flowing out of the distal part of the terminal. Thus any change of assignment of local channel density altered all of the current patterns.

Therefore when I was able to find a set of patterns all of which were similar to the corresponding record, I had far greater confidence that I was close to the density parameters in the terminal than I could have had from a fit to a single record only. The figure above, reproduced from Lindgren & Moore (1989) illustrate the quality of fit to five records with a single parameter set.

Back to: 3.1 Fitting
Back to: Top of 3.2 Manual Iterative Searches
Forward to: 3.3 Sensitivity Testing
Forward to: 3.4 Numerical Accuracy